库审查
sjkeller2026-10-28查看 856复制 1435
对这个黑曜石第二大脑进行每周审查——处理收件箱，检查项目和领域是否有停滞的工作，推广持久的知识，并修复金库的健康状况。当用户要求每周检查、保管库检查或定期清理时使用。
📘如何使用这个技能
- 1复制技能内容·点击上方「Copy SKILL.md」复制全部内容，或 Download 下载到本地
- 2打开你的 AI 客户端·支持 Claude Code、Trae、Cursor、ChatGPT、DeepSeek、Kimi 等任意 AI 助手
- 3粘贴为系统提示/知识文件·Claude Code：放入 .claude/skills/ 目录；普通对话：作为首条消息发送并说「请严格按这份技能文档执行」
- 4直接提出你的需求·AI 会按技能定义的工作流、格式和约束来处理，无需再解释背景
💡 提示：技能生效后，每次对话只需一句需求，AI 会按 SKILL.md 的流程执行。
SKILL.md2120 chars
--- name: vault-review description: Run the weekly review of this Obsidian second brain — process the inbox, check projects and areas for stalled work, promote durable knowledge, and repair vault health. Use when the user asks for a weekly review, a vault review, or a periodic cleanup. --- # Vault Review Use `python3` in the commands below; `py` is the fallback for Windows installations that do not expose that executable name. A weekly pass over the whole vault. Produce a review note, not just a chat summary. ## Gather the facts deterministically ``` python3 90-system/automation/vault.py check --compact python3 90-system/automation/vault.py tasks --state open --compact python3 90-system/automation/vault.py stale --days 180 --compact python3 90-system/automation/vault.py tags --compact ``` These four commands answer most review questions without reading a single note. Read notes only where a finding needs judgement. ## Create the review note ``` python3 90-system/automation/vault.py new --type review --title "<YYYY-Www>" ``` Then work through it: - **Inbox.** Anything left uncaptured or unfiled? Hand off to `vault-triage`. - **Projects.** Every active project needs a next action and a finish condition. Flag any with neither. Completed ones move to `80-archive`. - **Areas.** Which standards were neglected this week? - **Knowledge.** Promote durable lessons out of journal entries and projects into `40-knowledge`. This is the step that most often gets skipped. - **Engineering, when used.** Review scoped feedback and stale or conflicted patterns using [[90-system/Engineering Memory]]. Consolidate into the existing subject, preserving evidence and exceptions. Do not create a second style profile or copy session summaries. - **Health.** Work the `check` errors first, then warnings. Broken links and duplicate ids are real breakage; placement and staleness warnings are judgement calls. ## Report honestly State what you did not get to. A review that claims completeness it does not have is worse than one that names its gaps. Do not mark work complete on the user's behalf.