AlterLab因果推断
NVlabs2026-10-26查看 588复制 1883
从观察性和准实验数据估计因果效应——双重差分、工具变量、回归断点、面板固定效应、倾向得分/双重稳健方法以及异质性处理效应(CATE)——使用经过验证的Python技术栈:statsmodels和linearmodels(PanelOLS、IV2SLS)、pyfixest(feols、事件研究、Sun-Abraham、did2s)、DoWhy(identify -> estimate -> refute)、EconML(LinearDML、CausalForestDML、DRLearner)以及用于RD的rdrobust。它在估计之前命名识别假设,并在估计之后运行反驳/稳健性检查。当请求提到双重差分、工具变量、回归断点、固定效应/面板因果估计、倾向得分或从非随机数据估计处理效应时使用。对于先选择设计,优先使用alterlab-ssci-design-gate;对于普通回归或描述性统计,优先使用alterlab-statistical-analysis。属于AlterLab Academic Skills套件的一部分。
📘如何使用这个技能
- 1复制技能内容·点击上方「Copy SKILL.md」复制全部内容,或 Download 下载到本地
- 2打开你的 AI 客户端·支持 Claude Code、Trae、Cursor、ChatGPT、DeepSeek、Kimi 等任意 AI 助手
- 3粘贴为系统提示/知识文件·Claude Code:放入 .claude/skills/ 目录;普通对话:作为首条消息发送并说「请严格按这份技能文档执行」
- 4直接提出你的需求·AI 会按技能定义的工作流、格式和约束来处理,无需再解释背景
💡 提示:技能生效后,每次对话只需一句需求,AI 会按 SKILL.md 的流程执行。
SKILL.md6631 chars
---
name: alterlab-causal-inference
description: "Estimates causal effects from observational and quasi-experimental data — difference-in-differences, instrumental variables, regression discontinuity, panel fixed effects, propensity-score / doubly-robust methods, and heterogeneous treatment effects (CATE) — using the verified Python stack: statsmodels and linearmodels (PanelOLS, IV2SLS), pyfixest (feols, event studies, Sun-Abraham, did2s), DoWhy (identify -> estimate -> refute), EconML (LinearDML, CausalForestDML, DRLearner), and rdrobust for RD. It names the identifying assumption before estimating and runs a refutation/robustness check after. Use when the request mentions difference-in-differences, instrumental variables, regression discontinuity, fixed effects / panel causal estimation, propensity scores, or treatment-effect estimation from non-randomized data. For choosing the design first prefer alterlab-ssci-design-gate; for plain regression or descriptive stats prefer alterlab-statistical-analysis. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite."
license: MIT
allowed-tools: Read Bash(python:*)
compatibility: "Requires (declare in-session, no runtime install on Anthropic API): statsmodels, linearmodels>=6, pyfixest>=0.25, dowhy>=0.12, econml>=0.15, rdrobust>=1.3 (pip). Runs locally via `uv run python`; no API key."
metadata:
skill-author: AlterLab
version: "1.0.0"
depends_on: "alterlab-ssci-design-gate (design + assumption), alterlab-statsmodels, alterlab-statistical-analysis; audited by alterlab-ssci-inference-gate"
---
# Causal Inference — Name the Assumption, Estimate, Then Try to Break It
**Skill type: ANALYSIS MODULE.** Estimates a causal effect from data that was not fully
randomized. The discipline is not the estimator — it is the **identifying assumption** the
estimator relies on, stated before the fit and stress-tested after. If the design is not yet
fixed, that belongs upstream in `alterlab-ssci-design-gate`.
## Core Mission
```
EVERY CAUSAL ESTIMATE INHERITS AN ASSUMPTION. STATE IT, ESTIMATE UNDER IT, THEN REFUTE IT.
```
## When to Use This Skill
- "Estimate the effect with difference-in-differences / an event study."
- "I have an instrument for the treatment — run instrumental variables / 2SLS."
- "There's a cutoff score — run a regression discontinuity."
- "Panel data with unit and time fixed effects — estimate the treatment effect."
- "Give me the heterogeneous treatment effect / CATE across subgroups."
### Does NOT Trigger
| The request is really about… | Route to | Why not this skill |
|---|---|---|
| Choosing the design & its identifying assumption | `alterlab-ssci-design-gate` | Design routing precedes estimation. |
| Plain OLS / descriptive or inferential stats (no causal identification) | `alterlab-statistical-analysis` / `alterlab-statsmodels` | No treatment-effect identification problem. |
| Latent-variable / SEM / factor structure | `alterlab-sem-psychometrics` | Measurement model, not treatment effect. |
| Auditing whether the final claim is licensed | `alterlab-ssci-inference-gate` | Claim audit, downstream. |
## Estimator map (verified libraries, pinned)
| Design | Identifying assumption | Estimator (verified API) |
|--------|------------------------|--------------------------|
| **DiD / event study** | parallel trends | `pyfixest` (v0.60): `pf.feols("y ~ i(time, treat, ref) | unit + time", df)`, `pf.event_study(...)`, `pf.did2s(...)`; or `statsmodels` `smf.ols("y ~ treat*post").fit(cov_type='cluster', cov_kwds={'groups': df.unit})`. Staggered adoption → Sun-Abraham `sunab()` or `did2s`. |
| **Panel fixed effects** | no time-varying confounders | `linearmodels` (v7): `PanelOLS.from_formula("y ~ 1 + x + EntityEffects + TimeEffects", panel).fit(cov_type='clustered', cluster_entity=True)`. |
| **Instrumental variables** | exclusion restriction + relevance | `linearmodels` `IV2SLS.from_formula("y ~ 1 + exog + [treat ~ z1 + z2]", df).fit()`; check first-stage F (weak instrument). |
| **Regression discontinuity** | continuity at the cutoff (no sorting) | `rdrobust` (v2): `rdrobust(y, x, c=cutoff)`, `rdbwselect`, `rdplot`; McCrary/density check for manipulation. |
| **Selection-on-observables** | conditional ignorability | `DoWhy` (v0.14): `CausalModel(df, treatment, outcome, graph).identify_effect()` → `estimate_effect(method_name="backdoor.propensity_score_matching")` → `refute_estimate(..., method_name="random_common_cause")`. |
| **Heterogeneous effects (CATE)** | (as above) + overlap | `EconML` (v0.16): `LinearDML()` / `CausalForestDML()` `.fit(Y, T, X=X, W=W)` then `.effect(X)`. |
A stdlib router that maps the design to the estimator + its assumption + the verified call:
`scripts/estimator_router.py`. Fuller worked patterns and diagnostics:
`references/estimators.md`.
## The mandatory two steps around every estimate
1. **Before**: write the identifying assumption in one sentence and how you will defend it
(pre-trend plot for DiD, first-stage F and an exclusion argument for IV, density/McCrary test
for RDD, overlap/common-support for PSM). No assumption, no causal estimate.
2. **After**: run a refutation/robustness check — `DoWhy.refute_estimate` (random common cause,
placebo treatment, data subset), a pre-trend/event-study plot, a bandwidth-sensitivity for RDD,
or an E-value / sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding. Report it next to the estimate.
## Output Template
```
DESIGN + ASSUMPTION: <e.g. DiD; parallel trends, defended by the pre-2019 event-study plot>
ESTIMATOR: <library.call(...), pinned version>
ESTIMATE: <point estimate, 95% CI, clustered SE — never a bare p-value>
DIAGNOSTIC: <first-stage F / density test / pre-trends / overlap>
REFUTATION: <placebo / random-common-cause / bandwidth sensitivity result>
CLAIM SCOPE: causal IFF the assumption + diagnostics hold; else associational
```
## Quality Standards
- Report effect sizes with confidence intervals and the SE structure (clustered where relevant).
- Never present a causal estimate without its diagnostic and at least one refutation.
- Hand the final estimate + assumption to `alterlab-ssci-inference-gate` for the claim audit.
- No fabricated flags: every call above is verified against the library's current docs; if a
flag is unverified in your installed version, check `--help`/docs, do not guess.
## References
- `references/estimators.md` — per-design worked calls, diagnostics, and refutation menu.
- `scripts/estimator_router.py` — stdlib design→estimator+assumption router.
Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.