ERC状态
Faaz172026-10-25查看 1340复制 1719
报告 ERC-26 目前的状况,包括当前的构建阶段、已完成的工作、受阻的内容、距第一阶段截止日期的天数以及实际的下一步行动。当用户询问“我们在哪里”、“下一步是什么”或冷启动会话时使用。
📘如何使用这个技能
- 1复制技能内容·点击上方「Copy SKILL.md」复制全部内容,或 Download 下载到本地
- 2打开你的 AI 客户端·支持 Claude Code、Trae、Cursor、ChatGPT、DeepSeek、Kimi 等任意 AI 助手
- 3粘贴为系统提示/知识文件·Claude Code:放入 .claude/skills/ 目录;普通对话:作为首条消息发送并说「请严格按这份技能文档执行」
- 4直接提出你的需求·AI 会按技能定义的工作流、格式和约束来处理,无需再解释背景
💡 提示:技能生效后,每次对话只需一句需求,AI 会按 SKILL.md 的流程执行。
SKILL.md3181 chars
--- name: erc-status description: Report where ERC-26 stands right now, including current build phase, what's done, what's blocked, days to the Phase 1 deadline, and the literal next action. Use when the user asks "where are we", "what's next", or starts a session cold. --- # /erc-status, project status report Give a fast, honest snapshot. No fluff. ## Steps 1. Read `.claude/PROJECT_NOTES.md`. The blockers and "Next actions" sections are the source of truth. 2. Read the last entry in `docs/BUILD_LOG.md` for what actually happened most recently. 3. **Compute days remaining to 2026-09-15** from today's date, and state it. This is a fixed external deadline and it should lead the report. 4. Cross-check reality against the notes: - Is registration confirmed yet? This is blocker 1 and it gates everything - Does a container build and does Gazebo render? This is blocker 2 and the critical path - Does `src/` contain a real ROS 2 package with `solution.launch.py`, or just the README? - Does `docs/verified-topics.txt` exist, meaning the day-one verification actually happened? - Does `results/trials.csv` have rows? Without it the report cannot be written - Does `erc_images/` have images from a real run? - Any uncommitted git changes worth mentioning? 5. If the notes and reality disagree, say so explicitly. Stale notes mislead the next session. 6. Check whether the vault is in sync, per `docs/VAULT_SYNC.md`. If the vault project note is older than the last build log entry, flag it. Note that the vault note may not exist yet. ## Output format ``` ## ERC-26: <days> days to Phase 1 (2026-09-15) **Build phase:** <N, name> (<status>) **Done recently:** <1-3 bullets> **In flight:** <what's actually being worked on> **Blocked on:** <registration, environment, or a real technical blocker> **Points banked:** <from results/trials.csv, or "none logged yet"> ## Next action (do this literally next) <one concrete step> ``` ## Rules - **Lead with days remaining.** The deadline is fixed, external, and 29 days out as of 2026-08-17. Every status report should make the clock visible. - One next action, not five. The plan lists everything; this skill picks the *next* thing. - **Registration is unresolved until it is confirmed.** The 2026-06-30 deadline passed. Don't report the project as healthy while that is open, and don't assume either answer. - **Never report points as banked unless a logged trial recorded them.** "The detector works" is not points. A row in `results/trials.csv` is. - Respect build-order discipline. Never suggest a later phase task while an earlier phase lacks its gate. Specifically, do not suggest grasp work before the two perception nodes pass 20 of 20 reloads, because the cheap points come first for a reason. - If a gate says done but the deliverable doesn't exist on disk, it is not done. Say so. - Never report a rule detail as confirmed when `docs/RULES.md` marks it `(assumed)` or lists it as an open question. - **If the 2026-09-06 grasp decision date has passed and the grasp isn't working,** raise it. That decision is supposed to be made deliberately, and a status report is where it should surface.